Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

The Alabama Supreme Court May Collapse Obama's House of Cards! By Tommy Thompson Oct. 10, 2013..

The Alabama Supreme Court May Collapse Obama’s House Of Cards

What’s been the biggest obstacle in challenging Obama’s eligibility in court? It’s been finding a judge who isn’t afraid to allow the merits of the case against Obama to be argued in court. The Alabama Supreme Court might just be different. In an earlier case before the Alabama Supremes, Associate Judge Tom Parker stated that “McInnish has attached certain documentation (Joe Arpaio’s investigation) to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
Here, we have a judge who actually recognizes that the fake birth certificates are a serious issue and should be addressed. Now we have a new case before the Alabama Supreme Court. This case is McInnish/Goode v. Beth Chapman (SOS). It is being handled by famous attorney Larry Klayman. Also, it will be the first and only civil case in which Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse is personally involved. Chief investigator for Arpaio Mike Zullo has written a 200 point affidavit to this court and has agreed to testify in person. Zullo will show the court that the “picture” of the long form birth certificate is a 100% digitally created fake.
Now comes even better news. In the 2012 elections, Alabama elected Judge Roy Moore as the Chief Justice of her Supreme Court. In an earlier interview concerning the case against Terry Lakin, Justice Moore stated that he not only thought that Lt. Col Lakin had a right to question Obama’s eligibility, but had a duty to do so.
He also said that he has seen no documentary evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen, and in fact hasn’t seen anything that even proves he is a citizen of the US. Judge Roy Moore is a staunch Constitutionalist who declares that the Constitution is the “law of the land” and cannot be changed by politics. He’s a tough judge.
I’ve followed most of the eligibility cases, and I’ve noticed a very common occurrence. Even in those cases in which the judge appears to follow the law, there seems always to be a sudden and abrupt change. As in the Georgia case before Judge Michael Malihi, the case was pretty well decided by a default judgment against Obama when Malihi abruptly dismissed the case. This was done even though Obama’s attorneys refused to show up in court.
When you read Judge Malihi’s decision and compare it to his earlier denial of motion to dismiss, it’s as if they were written by two different people. Could it be that Judge Malihi got a visit? And from whom? And who wrote the decision? I don’t see this happening to Judge Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court. I don’t think they can be intimidated. There is no timeline for the court to rule on this case, so we wait to see what happens. This could be monumental.

Tommy Thompson
Alabama eligibility case in St.Clair County
Thompson v Kennedy (chairman of the Ala. Dem. Party
________________________________________________________
BS.Ranch Perspective:
I for one cannot wait to know what the closing statement by the Judge will be in this case!  The fact that it took one Sheriff, all the way to this situation and this was the only court that accepted the finding's of this Investigation.. Now I don't know what all their findings are, but what I can say is what they have found is unusual and there is some kind of wrong doing that has occurred either by Obama himself or someone on his team!! If it was someone on his Election Team, who were they working for and who gave them the idea or direction to falsify a Birth Certificate for the President of the United States of America, if these crimes have happened, then why did they happen.. If the President wasn't born in the United States of America, then where was he born??   
I for one believe that there has been some wrong doing in this case, I believe that there has been falsified paper's indicating the date and time of the Birth of President Obama!! If there was a finding that these papers were falsified, then when does the Impeachment Hearings Start?? 

BS.Ranch

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Obama, Holder Called Out for Not Enforceing Existing Gun Laws... NewsMax 02232013

Tags: guns | laws | obama | chicago


Obama, Holder Called Out for Not Enforcing Existing Gun Laws

Friday, 22 Feb 2013 07:06 PM
By Cyrus Afzali
Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Image: Obama, Holder Called Out for Not Enforcing Existing Gun Laws
Guns confiscated recently in crime-torn Chicago. (AP Photo)
A group of 23 Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee Friday sent letters to President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder demanding existing gun laws be enforced before additional limitations are passed.

The committee, which has held hearings in recent weeks on ways to prevent gun violence, again called into focus statistics that show a dramatic drop in federal weapons prosecutions over the past decade.

The letters cite a Syracuse University study that show firearms prosecutions under  President George W. Bush peaked at 11,015 in 2004 while the Obama administration has prosecuted about 7,774 firearms cases in 2012.

Urgent: 
Should Obama Ban Guns? Vote in Poll

"A prosecution rate this low is not indicative of a Department of Justice that takes the act of illegally attempting to acquire a firearm seriously," Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said in a statement accompanying the letters.

"We must all be looking for ways to prevent senseless acts of violence and the taking of innocent life but the best place to start would be enforcing the laws that Congress has already enacted."

Highlighting the crime rise in Chicago, the president's hometown, the lawmakers pointed out that the Northern District of Illinois, which includes Chicago, is ranked the lowest of all federal court districts in firearms prosecutions despite a surge in gun-related violence.

"In a city like Chicago, which saw 506 murders last year, it is appalling that the U.S. attorney's office in that jurisdiction only prosecuted 25 federal firearms cases during 2011," the group wrote.

The letter also points out that of the 76,142 gun permit requests that were denied following background checks by federally-licensed firearms dealers, only 4,732 were referred for prosecution. Of that total, only 62 prosecutions resulted.

In addition to Goodlatte, the letters were signed by Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner (Wis.), Trent Franks (Ariz.), Howard Coble (N.C.), Lamar Smith (Texas), Steve Chabot (Ohio), Spencer Bachus (Ala.), Darrell Issa (Calif.), Randy Forbes (Va.), Steve King (Iowa), Louie Gohmert (Texas), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Ted Poe (Texas), Jason Chaffetz (Utah), Steve Marino (Pa.), Trey Gowdy (S.C.), Mark Amodei (Nev.), Raul Labrador (Idaho), Blake Farenthold (Texas), George Holding (N.C.), Doug Collins (Ga.), Ron DeSantis (Fla.) and Keith Rothfus (Pa.).

© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.


Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/guns-laws-obama-chicago/2013/02/22/id/491637#ixzz2LoDgpEfk
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Government Motors: Why Wasn't The Chevy Volt Recalled by GM After Battery Fires BY Frank York, Dec. 13, 2011


Government Motors: Why Wasn’t The Chevy Volt Recalled By GM After Battery Fires?

DECEMBER 13, 2011 BY  
Shouldn't the Chevy Volt be recalled?
The Chevy Volt is supposed to be an example of the wonderful future of hybrid cars as part of the “green” revolution being pursued by President Obama.
Yet, after crash tests, Volt batteries have caught on fire days or weeks afterward. Consumer safety is supposed to be paramount to the Obama Administration, so why wasn’t this car immediately recalled?
The fire hazard was discovered back in June, 2011 only three weeks after the car had been crash tested. Yet five months went by before GM or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) warned dealers or customers about the fire hazard.
According to Joan Claybrook, a former administrator at the NHTSA, it was the “fragility of Volt sales” that was the reason for not notifying customers or dealers. Of course, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood denies this.
Car dealers began offering customers the right to return the Volt, but then changed direction and offered them loaner cars while the fires were investigated.
Did the Obama Administration decide to sacrifice consumer safety for sales of this electric car? The National Legal and Policy Center has filed a Freedom of Information Act to find out if there was deliberate collusion between GM and the NHTSA on this important consumer safety issue.
Heads should roll if it is proven that the Obama Administration deliberately sacrificed safety to pursue a green agenda.