Friday, November 19, 2010

Did You Know Your Airport Can Opt Out of TSA Molestations? (by Erick Erickson) November 16, 2010

Did You Know Your Airport Can Opt Out of TSA Molestations?


Byron York has good news for people around the country.

Your local airport can opt out of having the Transportation Safety Administration handle security at your local airport. Instead, you can contract out to the private sector. It was one of the ingenious and little noticed provisions the Republicans dropped in the post-9/11 legislation creating the TSA.

With a move to unionize the TSA and the TSA groping 3 year olds and nuns in nutty security theater, opt-ing out in favor of free market competence sounds like a great idea. Oh, and Congress will cover the payments to the TSA replacement.

Practicing what I preach, I am the Chairman of the Public Properties Committee of the City of Macon, Georgia. As such, I chair the committee that oversees the Middle Georgia Regional Airport. I will be drafting legislation to have my local airport opt-out of having the TSA grope passengers.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

SARAH PALIN: An open letter to Republican Freshmen Members of Congress (Nov. 16, 2010)

SARAH PALIN: An Open Letter to Republican Freshmen Members of Congress
By Sarah Palin
Published November 13, 2010 | FoxNews.com



Congratulations to all of you for your contribution to this historic election, and for the contributions I am certain you will make to our country in the next two years. Your victory was hard fought, and the success belongs entirely to you and the staff and volunteers who spent countless hours working for this chance to put government back on the side of the people. Now you will come to Washington to serve your nation and leave your mark on history by reining in government spending, preserving our freedoms at home, and restoring America’s leadership abroad.

Some of you have asked for my thoughts on how best to proceed in the weeks and months ahead and how best to advance an agenda that can move our country forward. I have a simple answer: stick to the principles that propelled your campaigns.

When you take your oath to support and defend our Constitution and to faithfully discharge the duties of your office, remember that present and future generations of “We the People” are counting on you to stand by that oath. Never forget the people who sent you to Washington.

GOP Assault on Federal Pay Puts Obama in Politically Difficult Position (By Stephen Clark) Nov. 16, 2010

GOP Assault on Federal Pay Puts Obama in Politically Difficult Position
By Stephen Clark
Published November 16, 2010 | FoxNews.com


ADVERTISEMENT
President Obama is stuck between a rock and a hard place, as newly empowered House Republicans unleash a torrent of proposals to shrink the size of government and following a series of reports that show federal workers increasing in numbers and salary.

Obama may have to choose between satisfying his base or placating independents who moved overwhelming into the Republican camp in the midterm elections two weeks ago based in part on their frustration over the growth of government in the past two years.

While slashing the government will be a top priority for Republicans in the next Congress, 60 percent of the federal workforce is represented by the labor unions that helped sweep the president into power two years ago.

"The calculation he has to make is how much he wants to bring that swing vote back," said Matrick Masters, a national labor expert and a professor of business and political science at Wayne State University.

"One of the ways is to go after government issues. The calculation he's going to make is how much damage it's going to do to the base," Masters told FoxNews.com. "He's got to realize he's got a difficult situation."

Already a flurry of proposals have been offered to slash spending on government functionaries.

Speaker-in-waiting John Boehner has called for a freeze in hiring and pay raises. Incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor said his federal payroll plan could save taxpayers $35 billion.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the top Republican on the subcommittee with oversight of the federal workforce who is likely to become the panel's next chairman, wants a 10 percent across-the-board pay cut.

Chaffetz told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that the federal payroll has grown by an additional 141,000 federal workers -- not counting Census employees, postal workers and uniformed members of the military -- since Obama took office. The president wants to hire 125,000 more workers.

Including compensation, the current cost of the federal workforce is $447 billion, he said.

"Somehow, some way, we're going to have to learn how to survive on just $400 billion," he said, adding that his proposal would give each agency and department discretion in how to reach a 10 percent reduction.

Even the chairman of Obama's bipartisan federal deficit commission has recommended a three-year freeze on federal salaries and a 10 percent cut in the number of federal workers as part of a draft report that some lawmakers say is dead on arrival.

But the proposals run counter to Obama's plan to give a 1.4 percent across-the-board pay raise to 2.1 million federal workers next fiscal year.

A USA Today analysis last week showed that the number of federal workers earning $150,000 or more per year has soared tenfold in the past five years and doubled since Obama took office.

But the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest union for federal employees and a staunch supporter of the president, rejects the notion that federal workers make more than their private-sector counterparts.

"There has been a concerted campaign by corporate-influenced groups and others to introduce the dangerous lie that federal employees are 'overpaid' relative to their private sector counterparts," union president John Gage said in a written statement.

Gage cited statistics from the Labor Bureau that showed federal salaries lag behind those in the private sector for almost all jobs in almost all locations throughout the U.S.

And AFGE spokeswoman Christine Erling said AFGE "vigorously opposes any efforts to freeze federal hiring and cut federal employees' pay."

"We have made and will continue to make our opposition to these types of punitive proposals known to the Obama administration as well as to the Congress," Erling said in an e-mail to FoxNews.com.

Supporters of federal pay rates note that the highest paid federal workers, such as doctors, lawyers and nuclear engineers, are earning well below market price. But the Heritage Foundation has estimated that taxpayers would save $47 billion if federal workers were paid at the same rate as private sector employees.

The White House did not respond to an e-mail seeking an interview, but unions, which represent more than 600,000 federal employees and total about 60 percent of the government workforce, put Obama in a politically difficult position if he wanted to seek a compromise with Republicans on the issue.

Labor was critical in mobilizing voters and getting them to cast ballots for Obama in 2008 but turnout dropped in the 2010 midterm in part because many union workers didn't see Obama go to bat for their initiatives, Masters said.

"I don't think those memories are lost upon him," he said. "He will need the support of labor in 2012."

Masters said that Obama will be under "intense" pressure to freeze hiring and pay in the federal workforce.

"It's a relatively easy thing to do -- a stroke of the pen and say, I'm going to freeze hiring, cap pay, and everybody is going to say, hip hip hooray -- jump for joy and not think about what it means," he said.

But, he suggested, Obama may just want to try to explain why he opposes a hiring freeze.

"What are you going to do if you have 1,000 air traffic controllers retire tomorrow morning? What are you going to do? But you don't want planes to be delayed. What's the economic consequence of that?" he asked by way of example. "It's going to have some impact."

In-State Tuition upheld for illegal immigrants (by Nanette Asimov, Chronicle Staff Writer) Nov. 16, 2010

In-state tuition upheld for illegal immigrants

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

California's Supreme Court became the first in the country Monday to affirm the right of illegal immigrants to pay the same college tuition as state residents, rather than the higher out-of-state rate.

The ruling upholds a 2002 state law that lets students pay in-state tuition at public colleges and universities if they attended a California high school for at least three years before graduating.

Civil rights groups, university officials and undocumented students themselves applauded the ruling, which may impact thousands of people living in the United States illegally who apply to California colleges each year.

California's tuition law affects not only undocumented students, but also anyone who meets the high school criteria, such as boarding school students whose parents live in other states or graduate students who grew up in California but lost residency by going to college somewhere else.

Nine states have similar laws.

Of the 2,000 or so University of California students who benefit from the law, about 400 are undocumented, according to a UC survey. Other state universities say they don't track students' status.

"Through their hard work and perseverance, these students have earned the opportunity to attend UC," said Mark Yudof, UC's president. "Their accomplishments should not be disregarded or their futures jeopardized."

Nonresidents sue

In 2005, 42 people who live outside California sued UC, arguing that the state's tuition law gave illegal residents an unfair advantage over legal U.S. residents when applying to college. Federal law prohibits such advantages for undocumented students "on the basis of residence within a state."

But Monday's ruling said the California law is not based on residence, but on such factors as how many years a student attended high school.

"If Congress had intended to prohibit states entirely from making unlawful aliens eligible for in-state tuition, it could easily have done so," the court ruled.

Attorney Kris Kobach, who represents the plaintiffs, called the ruling a "very weak opinion." He said he will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

Kobach, recently elected Kansas secretary of state, co-wrote Arizona's immigration law requiring police to question anyone they suspect of living in the country illegally. He said California's taxpayers lose millions of dollars each year because the state doesn't require undocumented students to pay the out-of-state rate.

But UC Berkeley sophomore Uriel Rivera, who entered the United States illegally at age 14, said taxpayers lose nothing because students like him have enough trouble paying the in-state rate.

Difference in tuition

At UC, state residents pay $11,300 in tuition a year; nonresidents pay $34,000. State and federal law prohibit illegal residents from receiving public grants or scholarships.

So Rivera and other undocumented students scramble for private scholarships. He wants to become a history teacher.

Today, however, Rivera is so far behind on tuition that the campus library won't even let him take out books.

Still, he said, he feels "happiness and relief" at the ruling. Without the tuition law, he said, "our chances of getting a college education would be nonexistent."

The case is Martinez vs. Regents of the University of California. The ruling can be found at sfg.ly/arNGH3.

E-mail Nanette Asimov at nasimov@sfchronicle.com.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/11/16/MNG61GCDH0.DTL

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Serial Killer Linked to Rubidoux Slayings (Press Enterprise) Nov. 16, 2010

Serial killer linked to Rubidoux slayings


  Download story podcast

04:24 PM PST on Tuesday, November 16, 2010

By JOHN ASBURY
The Press-Enterprise

Riverside County sheriff's homicide detectives have linked a convicted serial killer to the execution-style killing of an Ontario man and a Rubidoux woman, authorities announced.

Cold case detectives linked Alfredo Rolando Prieto, 44, as a suspect in the two Inland killings. The connection follows a death sentence Prieto received last week for two other murders in Fairfax, Virginia. In all, Prieto has been convicted of or is believed to be responsible for nine slayings prior to his arrest in 1990.

Prieto has been on California's Death Row since 1992 for the rape and shooting of a 15-year-old Yvonne Woodruff in Ontario. He was extradited to Virginia in 2005 following a DNA match to the murder of a couple in that state.

Story continues below
cold case Rubidoux slayings
Alfredo Rolando Prieto

Homicide detectives delayed announcing the arrest in the Rubidoux case for six weeks to avoid influencing the Virginia jury hearing testimony in his penalty phase.

A DNA hit led detectives to Prieto as the suspect in the May 1990 killing of Stacey Siegrist, 19, and Tony Gianuzzi, 21 whose bodies were discovered shot and dumped along a dirt powerline road off Canal and Alta streets.

Detectives recently notified family members of both victims about the match last month, 20 years after they were killed.

Sheriff's deputies said Siegrist was sexually assaulted and shot twice, once in the temple and one in the back of her head. Gianuzzi was bound at his wrists and ankles and shot twice in the back of the head and his neck.

The couple were dating and last seen May 3, 1990.

Earlier this year, Riverside County homicide detectives submitted DNA evidence found at the scene to Orchid Cellmark, a private lab in Texas. The testing was done through a 2009 National Institute of Justice grant awarded to the Sheriff's Department.

On Oct. 4, Prieto's DNA was matched to the 1990 crime scene, according to central homicide Sgt. Scott Brown. Detectives believe Prieto may have been working with up to two or three other suspects who have not been identified.

Homicide detectives plan to forward the case to the Riverside County district attorney to review if new charges will be filed.

Story continues below
cold case Rubidoux slayings
Tony Gianuzzi, left, and Stacey Siegrist were shot and killed in May 1990. They were dating and last seen May 3, 1990.

Prieto is already facing three death sentences for crimes in California and Virginia.

Beginning May 10, 1988, Prieto was suspected of sexually assaulting and shooting an Arlington, Virginia woman on May 10, 1988. He was linked to the death of Tina Jefferson through DNA, but has not been charged.

Then in December 1988, he raped and murdered 22-year-old Rachael Raver and killed Warren Fulton III, in Reston, VA. A jury recommended death in the killings last week, but Prieto has not been sentenced.

Prieto was later accused of shooting Manuel F. Sermeno, 27, in September 1989, leaving Sermeno's body in a burning car near Interstate 95 in Prince William, Virginia. He was linked to the case by gun ballistics, but has not been charged. Prosecutors said they are not likely to seek charges.

By May of 1990, detectives believe Prieto had come to California where he was accused of killing Siegrist and Gianuzzi in Rubidoux.

Prieto was suspected of shooting and killing Lula Farley, 71, in Ontario in June 1990. Her husband, Herbert Farley, was abducted and found shot two weeks later in Rubidoux. Prieto was matched to the case through ballistics but has not been charged.

Prieto's final murder came Sept. 2, 1990, when he and two other suspects kidnapped three women in Ontario during a home burglary. There, Prieto raped and shot Yvette Woodruff. The other two men raped the other two women and stabbed them repeatedly. The women survived, and later identified Prieto and the other two men. All three men were sentenced to death. Prieto's case is going through appeals in California.

The Rubidoux case is the fourth cold case homicide matched by the sheriff's Cold Case Unit since the grant was awarded. Detectives are reviewing 84 unsolved homicides with possible DNA evidence. So far, two cases have come back with suspect DNA.

Detectives are asking anyone with information to call investigator John Powers at 951-955-2777.

Reach John Asbury at 951-763-3451 or jasbury@PE.com

Comment on this story

Guidelines: We welcome your thoughts, but for the sake of all readers, please refrain from the use of obscenities, personal attacks or racial slurs. All comments are subject to our terms of service and may be removed. Repeat offenders may lose commenting privileges.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Lewis bill would return $12 Billion in Unspent Stimulus Money to Treasury (Press Enterprise By Ben Goad) Nov. 15, 2010

Lewis bill would return $12 billion in unspent stimulus money to Treasury



10:00 PM PST on Monday, November 15, 2010

By BEN GOAD
The Press-Enterprise
Ratcheting up his calls for reduced spending -- and his bid for a key position in the next Congress -- Inland Rep. Jerry Lewis introduced legislation Monday that would return all yet-to-be obligated federal stimulus money to the U.S. Treasury.

Roughly $12 billion of the $787 billion stimulus bill has not been obligated to any programs, said Lewis, R-Redlands, citing estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

"We must stop the spending of any of these funds now, before the Obama administration rushes to spend what's left before Republicans return to the majority in January," Lewis said.

Lewis and other Republicans have called for a return to 2008 spending levels as part of the "Pledge to America," the national campaign platform they unveiled in the months leading to their landslide Election Day victory.

Since Democrats will have control in the House until the current Congress ends next month, Lewis' bill is unlikely to move forward. But it might help sway Republican colleagues who will decide whether to give him the chairmanship of the House Appropriation Committee in the next Congress.

Lewis has served as the top GOP member of the panel, which oversees government spending, for the last six years. Due to term limits Republicans place on certain positions, he'll need a waiver from the party's steering committee to serve as chairman.

Some conservative-leaning groups and media outlets have come out in opposition to Lewis' bid for the chairmanship, questioning whether he is a true fiscal hawk.

The bill introduced Monday, and a letter he sent to the White House calling on President Barack Obama to halt stimulus spending, reflect the latest in a series of actions Lewis has taken in recent months to show he is serious about working to cut the deficit.

Reach Ben Goad at 202-661-8422 or bgoad@PE.com

Sunday, November 14, 2010

How Congress was Prepped to Dismiss 'Birthers' (World Net Daily News, Sunday, Nov. 14, 2010) By Jerome R. Corsi

Sunday, November 14, 2010


BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

How Congress was prepped to dismiss 'birthers'
Research office memo includes FactCheck.org attack

Posted: November 11, 2010
10:15 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi


WorldNetDaily

The Congressional Research Service issued a memo to prepare members of Congress to rebut and defuse questions constituents were asking regarding Barack Obama's presidential eligibility under the "natural born citizen" requirement of the Constitution.

CRS staff member Jerry W. Mansfield, an information research specialist in the Knowledge Services Group, confirmed to WND that he authored the June 5, 2009, CRS memo entitled "Qualifications of Barack Obama to Be President of the United States."

WND has posted the CRS memo on Scribd.com for download.

Attached to the memo was an attack piece published by FactCheck.org to dismiss claims that Obama's short-form Certification of Live Birth, or COLB, originally published during the 2008 presidential campaign by DailyKos.com, was a forgery.

The memo was addressed to Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Calif., and sent to Jeffrey Post, a staff member in the congressman's office.

Get the free, in-depth special report on eligibility that could bring an end to Obama's presidency

Attached to the memo were copies of four articles from the Internet aimed at debunking and dismissing arguments questioning Obama's eligibility.

(Story continues below)

The CRS memo surfaced with a fax cover sheet sent by staffer Jeffrey Post from Bilbray's Washington, D.C., office June 8, 2009, three days after Mansfield authored the memo and compiled the Internet attachments.



The CRS is a public policy research arm of the United States Congress that is organized as a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress. It works exclusively for members of Congress, congressional committees and congressional staff in an advisory capacity, answering questions.

Bilbray's office did not respond to repeated WND requests for comment. Jeffrey Post in Bilbray's office told WND he was not authorized to speak with the press.

In the CRS memo, Mansfield writes: "Per your request we are enclosing several articles that address concerns about the birth certificate of President Obama, his place of birth and how questions surrounding it were ultimately resolved."

In the second sentence, Mansfield suggests that questions raised about Obama's eligibility have been conclusively dismissed as Internet falsehoods that are taking on mythical proportions: "Also included are a lengthy piece prepared by the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania [http://www.factcheck.org] and an article that points out that the Internet includes falsehoods and they can live forever."



Mansfield told WND that he had written the memo to provide responses Bilbray could give to constituents who were peppering his congressional office for a response to eligibility challenges.

WND has reported that Bilbray is on the record saying there is no need for the president to have been born in the United States – or to have two parents who are U.S. citizens – to be a "natural born citizen" and be eligible for the Oval Office.

The controversy over Bilbray's comments developed when a YouTube.com video was posted. In the video of a television interview on MSNBC's "The Ed Show," Bilbray said, "It's just like people thinking that you gotta be born in the United States to be president. You don't have to be. That's a legend. We got to clarify that."

Mansfield said he "did not conduct any investigation."

"I merely responded to a request from a congressional office to answer a constituent," he said.

Asked why he did not balance his memo with published articles questioning Obama's eligibility, Mansfield responded, "I reported what Hawaii Department of Health officials said because they were official statements made by government employees. There has been nothing official said by any official of government, so far as I know, supporting questions raised about Obama's eligibility. So, there is no issue here."

When WND asked Mansfield if it was his job, in writing the memo, to draw a conclusion for Bilbray, he objected.

"The attachments were articles in print," he said. "I was simply trying to pass on what is in the press."

Mansfield was reluctant to talk to the press, and he ended the call abruptly saying, "I am getting contacted by irate people over this memo. It was meant as an advisory to a member of Congress. It was never meant to be released to the public"

The attachment from FactCheck.org was a posting on Aug. 21, 2008, entitled "The truth about Obama's birth certificate."

The first paragraph makes clear the piece was aimed at refuting the claim that the COLB was "fake."



To refute the claim, FactCheck.org cited a statement by Hawaii Department of Health official Chiyome Fukino asserting she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, had verified that the health department holds "Obama's original birth certificate."



Fukino issued a carefully worded statement on Hawaii DOH stationary Oct. 31, 2008, giving the impression that the agency possessed Obama's "original birth certificate," even though that is not precisely what she said.

Here is the press release in question:



What Fukino said was that she had "personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."

The key phrase was the qualification "in accordance with state policies and procedures."

Fukino did not explicitly say she had seen Obama's original birth certificate or his long-form hospital-generated birth certificate.

WND has reported that the Hawaii Department of Health in 1961 would issue a Certification of Live Birth on the basis of family testimony, without any additional proof the child was actually born in Hawaii.

WND has also reported that the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to substantiate the claim made by FactCheck.org and other Obama supporters that the short-form COLB is an authentic document issued by the Hawaii DOH.

The FactCheck.org article, updated Nov. 1, 2008, included a mention of Fukino's carefully worded statement issued Oct. 31, 2008, claiming the statement "confirmed … Obama was born in Honolulu," even though Fukino made no such direct claim.

Nor did Mansfield point out in his CRS memo to Bilbray that the Annenberg Public Policy Center that finances FactCheck.org also financed Barack Obama who served as the Chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge in 1995. At that time the CAC made a $482,662 grant to a workshop project headed by Mike Klonsky, a former top communist activist who is an associate of former Weather Underground terrorist leader William Ayers, as documented by WND reporter Aaron Klein.

The three other Internet pieces Mansfield attached to his CRS memo to Bilbray were:

  • A story from the Honolulu Star-Bulletin Nov. 1, 2008, entitled "Officials verify birth certificate of Obama," reporting on Fukino's Oct. 31, 2008, press release;

  • An editorial published in the McClatchy-Tribune Business News Dec. 9, 2008, entitled "Obama birth certificate gets a pass from the Supreme Court," in which the litigation brought by Leo Donofrio in the case Donofrio v. Wells was described by the newspaper as "wacky" and "specious";

  • A story by Tim Jones published in the McClatchy-Tribune Business News Dec. 8, 2008, entitled "Internet drives Barack Obama birth-certificate battle: Web allows opinions to 'live forever,' expert says," in which WND was characterized as "a popular, political right-leaning site" that has chronicled "the campaign challenging the legitimacy of Obama's 1961 birth certificate or the legality of his taking office."

Mansfield attached to his CRS memo to Bilbray no articles published on the Internet by WND or any other source examining critically the Obama eligibility issue.

As WND reported a CRS memorandum authored by Jack Maskell, the Legislative Attorney in the American Law Division, April 3, 2008, admits openly that no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – ever bothered to check Obama's eligibility to be president.

But WND has reported statements from members of Congress that are based on arguments presented in the material provided by CRS.

Among the statements from members of Congress that have appeared:

  • Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.: "Thank you for your recent e-mail. Senator Obama meets the constitutional requirements for presidential office. Rumors pertaining to his citizenship status have been circulating on the Internet, and this information has been debunked by Snopes.com, which investigates the truth behind Internet rumors."

  • Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla.: "Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice – first in the primary elections and again in the general election. President-Elect Obama won the Democratic Party's nomination after one of the most fiercely contested presidential primaries in American history. And, he has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States. Throughout both the primary and general election, concerns about Mr. Obama's birthplace were raised. The voters have made clear their view that Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of president."

  • Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio: "President Obama has provided several news organizations with a copy of his birth certificate, showing he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Hawaii became a state in 1959, and all individuals born in Hawaii after its admission are considered natural-born United States citizens. In addition, the Hawaii State Health Department recently issued a public statement verifying the authenticity of President Obama's birth certificate."

  • U.S. Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla.: "The claim that Barack Obama is not a citizen of the U.S. is false. This rumor is simply election year politics." She referred questioners to Snopes for documentation.

  • Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.: "The courts have held that President Obama is a natural-born American citizen. Moreover, in December 2008, the Supreme Court declined to hear a lawsuit challenging Mr. Obama's eligibility to serve as president, concurring with three other federal courts in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Washington. The courts have confirmed the determination of state officials in Hawaii that health department records prove that Barack Obama was born a U.S. citizen in Honolulu."

  • Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.: "President Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961."

  • Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa.: "I am confident that Mr. Obama meets all the constitutional requirements to be our 44th president. Mr. Obama has posted a copy of his birth certificate on his campaign website and submitted an additional copy to the independent website FactCheck.org. The birth certificate demonstrates that he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961, thereby making him a natural-born citizen eligible to be president."

  • U.S. Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif.: "As you know, some questions were raised about whether President Obama is a natural born citizen. There was a recent lawsuit arguing that he is not eligible for the Presidency for this reason. I understand that the Supreme Court considered hearing this lawsuit, but it ultimately turned down the request to have the case considered before the full court. I further understand that the director of Hawaii's Department of Health recently confirmed that President Obama was born in Honolulu and has personally verified that her agency has his original birth certificate on record. As you know, the U.S. Congress certified his election on January 8, and he was sworn into office on January 20, 2009. While I may disagree with President Obama on a multitude of issues, he has been elected as President of the United States through a fair process and has shown sufficient documentation, via a state birth certificate, that has been verified as being authentic. In short, therefore, I do not believe sufficient evidence was brought to light to conclude that President Obama was ineligible for the office."

  • U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes, D-N.H.: "President Obama publicly posted his birth certificate on his campaign website which confirms that he was born in Hawaii in 1961. This birth certificate confirms that President Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States, above the age of 35, and is therefore qualified to be President of the United States of America. If you would like to view President Obama's birth certificate, I encourage you to go to the website http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate."

  • "Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, "The Constitution and federal law require that, among other things, only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) may be President of the United States. In President Obama's case, some individuals have filed lawsuits in state and federal courts alleging that he has not proven that he is an American citizen, but each of those lawsuits have been dismissed. This includes a recent decision by the United States Supreme Court to not review an "application for emergency stay" filed by a New Jersey resident claiming that the President is not a natural born citizen because his father was born in Kenya. Furthermore, both the Director of Hawaii's Department of Health and the state's Registrar of Vital Statistics recently confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency. If contrary documentation is produced and verified, this matter will necessarily be resolved by the judicial branch of our government under the Constitution."

  • "Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa.: "On June 13, 2008, the Obama campaign released a copy of his birth certificate after numerous claims were made about his eligibility to hold the office of President. The released copy created additional questions, because it contained a blacked out department file number and was apparently missing a seal, and it was impossible to detect raised text, a common characteristic of official documents. There were satisfactory answers to such questions, however: the department file number had been blacked out to prevent hackers from breaking into the Health Department's system, and the State places the seal on the back of the certificate. The website Factcheck.org investigated the matter and provided high-resolution photos taken at multiple angles that revealed the raised text and the seal on the back of the document. ... Accordingly, it has been concluded that President Obama has met the constitutional qualifications to be President of the United States."

  • U.S. Rep Vic Snyder, D-Ark.: "According to State of Hawai'i officials, the Hawai'i State Department of Health has President-elect Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with that state's policies and procedures.